Racism and epistemic injustice. Variations on Javier de Lucas's Atticus Finch
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7203/CEFD.49.26241
Abstract
Javier de Lucas’ book Nosotros, que quisimos tanto a Atticus Finch (De las raíces del supremacismo, al Black Lives Matter) is an excellent example of how productive cinema and literature are for teaching and legal research. In line with the analysis presented in that book, here it is proposed to complete it with the discussion of the concept of epistemic injustice, one of whose classic examples is the trial of Tom Robinson in To Kill a Mockingbird. In this sense, the concept is of interest in the field of law, a relationship that has not yet been overly explored.
Downloads
Publication Facts
Reviewer profiles N/A
Author statements
- Editor & editorial board
- profiles
- Academic society
- N/A
- Publisher
- Universitat de València
To learn about these publication facts, click 
PF is maintained by the Public Knowledge Project
Author Biography
Carlos Lema Añón, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
Carlos Lema Añón
Profesor Titular de Filosofía del Derecho
Departamento de Derecho Internacional, Eclesiástico y Filosofía del Derecho
References
Almagro, M, Osorio, J y Villanueva, N. 2021, “La injusticia testimonial como arma”, Las Torres de Lucca. Revista internacional de filosofía política, vol. 10, n. 19(19), pp. 43-57.
Alba Rico, S, “El cine”, CTXT. Contexto y Acción, consultado el 20-2-2023, https://ctxt.es/es/20230201/Firmas/42151/Santiago-Alba-Rico-rico-ficcion-George-Melies-Lumiere.htm
Anderson, Elizabeth, 2012, “Epistemic Justice as a Virtue of Social Institutions”, Social Epistemology: A Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy, vol. 26, nº 22, pp. 163–173.
De Lucas, Javier, 2002, Blade Runner: el Derecho, guardián de la diferencia, Tirant lo Blanch, Valencia.
De Lucas, Javier, 2014, “Comprender y enseñar el Derecho desde el cine”, Teoría y Derecho. Revista de pensamiento jurídico, nº 15, pp. 109-122.
De Lucas, Javier, 2020, Nosotros, que quisimos tanto a Atticus Finch (De las raíces del supremacismo, al Black Lives Matter), Tirant lo Blanch, Valencia.
Fricker, Miranda, 2007, Epistemic injustice: power and the ethics of knowing, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Fricker, Miranda, 2017, “Evolving concepts of epistemic injustice”, en IJ Kidd, J Medina y G. Pohlhaus, The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice, Routledge, Nueva York, pp. 53-60.
Garza Onofre, Juan Jesús, 2019, Historia alternativa de la abogacía. Análisis crítico sobre la profesión, Fontamara-Facultad Libre de Derecho de Monterrey, México.
Grasswick, Heidi, 2018, “Feminist Social Epistemology”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 Edition), EN Zalta (ed.), consultado el 20-2-2023, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/feminist-social-epistemology.
Lema, Carlos, 2023, “De la ignorancia del derecho a la injusticia epistémica en el derecho. Injusticia testimonial e injusticia hermenéutica como obstáculos para el acceso a la justicia”, Oñati Socio-Legal Series, Vol. 23, nº 2.
Luban, David, 2013, “¿Existe el derecho humano a un abogado?”, en C García Pascual, El buen jurista. Deontología de Derecho, Tirant Lo Blanch, Valencia, pp. 217-232.
Medina, José, 2017, “Varieties of hermeneutic injustice”, en IJ Kidd, J Medina y G. Pohlhaus, The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice, Routledge, Nueva York, pp. 41-54.
Polhaus, Gaile, 2017, “Varieties of epistemic injustice”, en IJ Kidd, J Medina y G. Pohlhaus, The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice, Routledge, Nueva York, pp. 13-26.
Sullivan, Shannon, 2017, “Epistemic justice and the Law”, en IJ Kidd, J Medina y G. Pohlhaus, The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice, Routledge, Nueva York, pp. 293-302.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
-
Abstract450
-
PDF (Español)605
Most read articles by the same author(s)
Make a Submission
Language
