When Can Repentance Mitigate Criminal Punishment?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7203/CEFD.50.26456
Abstract
In the criminal law literature, repentance becomes relevant in a specific context: conviction, more precisely, in determining the penalty of an individual who has been found responsible for the commission of a crime and who, in turn, expresses remorse for their actions. From a communicative conception of punishment, this paper addresses the following questions: does repentance mean a lesser criminal reproach, or is it indifferent to the determination of the penalty? If it implies an approach to the minimum punishment stipulated by legislation, when is it reasonable for this to occur?
Downloads
Publication Facts
Reviewer profiles N/A
Author statements
- Academic society
- N/A
- Publisher
- Universitat de València
References
Arendt, Hannah; The Human Condition, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1998.
Bibas, Stephanos; “Forgiveness in Criminal Procedure”, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, (4) 2, 2007, pp. 329–348.
Card, Claudia; The Atrocity Paradigm. A Theory of Evil, New York: Oxford University Press, 2002, DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/0195145089.001.0001
Chitov, Alexander; “The Communicative Theory of Punishment and Repentance”, Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, 4, 2018, pp. 162–180.
Duff, Robert Antony; Punishment, communication and community, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Gardner, John; Ofensas y defensas. Ensayos selectos sobre filosofía del derecho penal, Marcial Pons, Madrid, 2007.
Lariguet, Guillermo; Dilemas y conflictos trágicos. Una investigación conceptual, Lima: Palestra Editores, Bogotá: Editorial Temis., 2008.
McConnell, Terrance; “Moral Dilemmas”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2022, URL https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2022/entries/moral-dilemmas/
Murphy, Jeffrie; Character, Liberty, and Law. Kantian Essays in Theory and Practice, Boston: Springer Science & Business Media, B. V., 1998, DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9066-2
Murphy, Jeffrie; “Remorse, Apology, and Mercy”, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, (4) 2, 2007, pp. 423-453.
Nino, Carlos Santiago; Los límites de la responsabilidad penal. Una teoría liberal del delito, Buenos Aires: Editorial Astrea, 1980.
Nozick, Robert; Philosophical Explanations, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1981.
Nussbaum, Martha; Hiding from Humanity. Disgust, Shame, and the Law, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.
Nussbaum, Martha; Political Emotions. Why Love Matters for Justice, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2013, DOI https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt6wpqm7
Nussbaum, Martha; Anger and Forgiveness. Resentment, Generosity, Justice, New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.
Serrano, Manuel Francisco; “Los elementos constitutivos del concepto de pena natural”, Política Criminal, (17) 34, 2022, pp. 856-884. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-33992022000200856
Serrano, Manuel Francisco; El concepto de pena natural en la doctrina y la jurisprudencia penal, Bernal: Universidad Nacional de Quilmes, 2023.
Silva Sánchez, Jesús-María; Malum passionis. Mitigar el dolor del Derecho Penal, Barcelona: Atelier Libros Jurídicos, 2018.
Singler, Mary; “Mercy, Clemency, and the Case of Karla Faye Tucker”, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, (4) 2, 2007, pp. 455-486.
Smart, Alwynne; “Mercy”, Philosophy, (43) 166, 1968, pp. 345–359, DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819100062872
Snow, Nancy; “Self-forgiveness”, The Journal of Value Inquiry, (27) 1, 1993, pp. 75–80. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01082713
Tasioulas, John; “Punishment and Repentance”, Philosophy, (81) 2, 2006, pp. 279–322. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819106316063
Tasioulas, John; “Repentance and the Liberal State”, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, (4) 2, 2007, pp. 487-521.
Williams, Bernard; “Ethical Consistency” en Moral Dilemmas, New York: Oxford University Press, 1987, pp. 115–137.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
-
Abstract367
-
PDF (Español)1576