A primer on the 2022 Spanish Labour Reform
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7203/IREP.4.1.24764Abstract
In February 2022, the Spanish Parliament approved a major reform of the labour market regulation that aimed at rolling back parts of the liberal reform of 2012 promoted by the conservatives and, simultaneously, confront the high rate of temporary employment that for decades has been one of the characteristics of the Spanish labour market vis a vis the EU. This paper has two aims. The first one is to describe the major changes sponsored by the reform and the problems it pretends to address with them. The second, to discuss how the reform combines with other decisions taken by the government regarding the labour market, in what could be considered a program of modernization and upgrading of the Spanish labour market. Although is too early to make a full evaluation of the reform, the paper presents some of its short-term effects and discusses its potential shortcomings.
Downloads
References
Albert, C., García-Serrano, C. and Hernanz, V. (2005). Firm-provided training and temporary contracts, Spanish Economic Review, 7, 67–88.
Álvarez, I., Uxó, J., Febrero, E. (2019). Internal devaluation in a wage-led economy: the case of Spain. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 43(2), 335–360.
Bhaduri, A., Marglin, S. (1990). Unemployment and the real wage: the economic basis for contesting political ideologies, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 14, 375-393.
Banco de España (2021). Los efectos del Salario Mínimo Interprofesional en el empleo: nueva evidencia para España, Documentos Ocasionales Nº 2113.
Bellani, D., and Bosio, G. (2021). Knockin’ on heaven’s door? Reframing the debate on temporary employment and wages: evidence from Europe, Socio-Economic Review, 19(3), 869–907.
Boeri, T., Van Ours, (2008). The Economics of Imperfect Labor Markets, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Cebrián, I., Moreno, G and Toharia L. (2004). Are Spanish open-ended contracts permanent? Duration and Trajectory Analyses, Paper submitted to the 2004 EALE Conference, Lisbon 12-14, September 2004.
Choi, K., Chung Choe, C., and Lee, D. (2021). The Effect of Employing Temporary Workers on Efficiency: Evidence from a Meta-Frontier Analysis, SAGE Open October-December: 1–7.
CCNCC (2018). Cláusulas sobre denuncia y ultraactividad en los convenios colectivos, Comisión Consultiva Nacional de Convenios Colectivos, Madrid.
CCOO (2019). La subida del salario mínimo en 2019. Una visión territorial y por federaciones de CCOO, Gabinete Económico CCOO, Madrid.
CCOO (2022a). Los costes económicos y sociales de la inestabilidad en el empleo y las reformas de 2010 y 2012, Gabinete Económico de CCOO, Madrid.
CCOO (2022b). Análisis del impacto del incremento del salario mínimo profesional a 1000 Euros, Gabinete Económico de CCOO, Madrid. Cruces Aguilera J. M. et al. (2016): El impacto de la reforma laboral de 2012 en la negociación colectiva (2013-2015), Editorial Levefre El Derecho, Madrid.
Cruz Villalon, J. (2022). La negociación colectiva en la reforma laboral de 2001. CCNCC Boletín, 82, abril, 2022.
Grèbol Jiménez, R., Vall Castelló, J. (2021). The impact of temporary contracts on suicide rates, PLoS ONE, 16(5): e0252077. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252077.
Heimberger, P. (2020). Does Employment Protection Affect Unemployment? A Meta-analysis, Working Paper 176, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, Viena.
ISSP (2015). Work Orientation IV, International Social Survey Program, https://issp.org/about-issp/
Kleinknecht, Alfred, (1998). Is Labour Market Flexibility Harmful to Innovation?, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 22(3), 387-96.
Lindbeck, A., and Snower, D. J. (1988). Cooperation, harassment, and involuntary unemployment: an insider-outsider approach. The American Economic Review, 167-188.
Lisi, D., and Malo, M.A. (2017). The impact of temporary employment on productivity. Journal of Labour Market Research, 50, 91–112.
Marglin, S.A. and A. Bhaduri (1990). Profit squeeze and Keynesian theory, in S. A. Marglin and J.B. Schor (eds.), The Golden Age of Capitalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 153 –186.
Muñoz de Bustillo, R. (2014). Questioning the myth of expansionary austerity: European macroeconomic policy during the crisis and its aftermath, in Bilbao Ubillos, J. (ed): The Economic Crisis and Governance in the European Union. A critical assessment, Routledge, 114-133.
Muñoz de Bustillo Llorente, R., Sarkar, S., Sebastian, R. and Antón, J.-I. (2018). Educational mismatch in Europe at the turn of the century: Measurement, intensity and evolution, International Journal of Manpower, 39(8), 977-995. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-10-2018-0327
Muñoz de Bustillo, R. and Antón, J. I. (2010). From Sending to Host Societies: Immigration in Greece, Ireland and Spain in the 21st Century, Industrial Relations Journal, 41(6), 563-583.
OECD (2020). OECD Employment Outlook 2020: Worker Security and the COVID-19 Crisis, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Polanyi K. (1944). The Great Transformation, Beacon Press, Boston.
Pinto Hernández, F. (2019). La estabilidad del contrato indefinido en España, en Ensayos en microeconometría aplicada, Tesis Doctoral, Universidad de Salamanca, 31-48.
Solow, R. (1992). Labor Market as a Social Institution, Basil Blackwell, Cambridge, Mass.
Stockhammer, E. (2015). Wage-led versus Profit-led Demand: What Have we Learned? A Kalecki-Minsky View, Post Keynesian Economics Study Group Working Paper 1512, December 2015.
Zhou, H., Dekker, R., Kleinknecht, A. (2011). Flexible labor and innovation performance: evidence from longitudinal firm-level data, Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(3), 941–968.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
-
Abstract964
-
PDF INGLÉS (Español)790
Issue
Section
License
Copyright is the right exercised by the creator over his/her literary and artistic work. The owner of the copyright is, as a rule, the person who creates the work, which is to say the author. In Copyright Law, the author is considered to be “the natural person who creates a literary, artistic or scientific piece of work”. Although in principle it is only natural or physical persons who may be considered to be authors, the law foresaw certain cases in which legal persons could also benefit from these rights.
Authorship is irrevocable; it may not be transmitted either inter vivos or in the form of a testamentary trust; it does not disappear with the passage of time nor is it public domain; it is not subject to the statute of limitations.
Copyright Law has a dual nature; it covers moral rights (paternity, integrity, dissemination…), and property rights (reproduction, distribution, public communication, transformation):
Moral rights (article 14 of the Spanish Copyright Law). These refer to acknowledgement of authorship. They are irrevocable and inalienable and correspond to the right to:
- Decide whether his/her work is to be disseminated and how.
- Acknowledge authorship of the work.
- Demand respect for the integrity of the work.
- Modify the work while being respectful of the rights acquired.
- Withdraw the work from sale, without prejudice to compensation for damages to the owners of the right of use.
- Access the single,unique copy of the work that is held by a third party
Property rights (articles 18 to 25 of the Spanish Copyright Law). They refer to the four types of right of use. They allow the owner of the work to obtain financial compensation for the third-party use of his/her work:
- Reproduction: obtaining of copies of all or part of the work.
- Distribution: the public availability of the work through its sale, rental, loan or by any other means.
- Public Communication: action through which a group of people may have access to the work.
- Transformation: the translation, adaptation and any other modification of the work, leading, or not, to new work derived from it.