Towards the right standards: The intersection of open science, responsible research and innovation, and standards
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7203/metode.11.16103Keywords:
standards, open science, responsible research and innovationAbstract
The introduction of standards in research and development leading to new products or innovative processes can be thought of as a particularly technical approach to framing scientific enterprises. At the other end of the spectrum, open science or responsible research and innovation may be initially thought of as concepts with no underlying technical approaches to support them. In reality as currently practiced, the development and use of standards engages significant non-technical aspects, needing to take into account research cultures or desired societal outcomes. Similarly, open science, and responsible research and innovation can operate using very practical and technical approaches. This essay focuses at the intersections of these concepts to try to contribute to larger discussions in both the research and governance communities as to how researchers should conduct their research, and what respective responsibilities of researchers, their institutes, and their supporters are.
Downloads
References
BioRoboost. (2019). Bioroboost. Retrieved April 1, 2020, from http://standardsinsynbio.eu/?page_id=53
cOAlition S. (2019). About Plan S. Retrieved April 2, 2020, from https://www.coalition-s.org/
CoNOSC. (2020). Council for National Open Science Coordination. Retrieved April 2, 2020, from https://conosc.org/
European Commission. (2014). Responsible research and innovation: Europe’s ability to respond to societal challenges. European Union. Retrieved April 1, 2020, from https://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/pub_rri/KI0214595ENC.pdf
European Commission. (2020). Open Science Policy Platform. Retrieved April 2, 2020, from https://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/index.cfm?pg=open-science-policy-platform
Force11. (2017). The FAIR data principles. Retrieved March 31, 2020, from https://www.force11.org/group/fairgroup/fairprinciples
Garfinkel, M. (2012). ESF strategic workshop on biological containment of synthetic microorganisms: Science and policy. European Science Foundation Exploratory Grant. Retrieved April 2, 2020, from https://www.embo.org/documents/science_policy/biocontainment_ESF_EMBO_2012_workshop_report.pdf
Hof, R. D. (2011, July 25). Lessons from Sematech. MIT Technology Review. Retrieved March 31, 2020, from https://www.technologyreview.com/s/424786/lessons-from-sematech/
Owen, R., Macnaghten, P., & Stilgoe, J. (2012). Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy, 39(6), 751–760. http://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs093
Pulverer, B. (2015). When things go wrong: Correcting the scientific record. EMBO Journal 34, 2483–2485. http://doi.org/10.15252/embj.201570080
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
-
Abstract1007
-
PDF418
-
(Español)2
Issue
Section
License
All the documents in the OJS platform are open access and property of their respective authors.
Authors publishing in the journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors keep the rights and guarantee Metode Science Studies Journal the right to be the first publication of the document, licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of authorship and publication in the journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to spread their work through electronic means using personal or institutional websites (institutional open archives, personal websites or professional and academic networks profiles) once the text has been published.