Beauty and mate choice: What evolutionary biology can teach us

Authors

  • Enrique Font Cavanilles Institute of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology (UV, Spain).
  • Enrique V. Font‐Ferrer JIMB Foundation (Valencia, Spain).

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7203/metode.13.24205

Keywords:

beauty, mate choice, evolution, evolutionary psychology, sexual selection

Abstract

We tend to regard beauty as the product of our education, the quintessence of cultural refinement, and we often emphasise the relative nature of beauty. That is why many find it shocking that the perception of beauty, especially human beauty, has a clear biological explanation, one that is largely independent from our education and culture. People are surprised because not only do the characteristics that define beauty originate in biology, but they are also universal and common to all members of our species.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Enrique Font, Cavanilles Institute of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology (UV, Spain).

Full professor in the Department of Zoology at the University of Valencia (UV) and director of the Ethology Laboratory (e3) at the Cavanilles Institute of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology (UV, Spain). He is an ethologist (University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA), and his research deals with a variety of topics related to animal behaviour, especially behaviour and communication in lizards.

Enrique V. Font‐Ferrer, JIMB Foundation (Valencia, Spain).

Neuropsychologist and graduate in Psychology, with master’s degrees in General Health Psychology from the University of Valencia (UV) and in Clinical Psychology from the Instituto Superior de Estudios Psicológicos (ISEP). He is currently working on the implementation of a project to assist stroke patients and their families at the JIMB Foundation (Valencia, Spain).

References

Bovet, J., & Raymond, M. (2015). Preferred women’s waist-to-hip ratio variation over the last 2,500 years. PLOS ONE, 10(4), e0123284. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123284

Buss, D. (2016). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. Basic Books.

Cloud, J. M., & Perilloux, C. (2014). Bodily attractiveness as a window to women’s fertility and reproductive value. In V. A. Weekes-Shackelford & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on human sexual psychology and behavior (pp. 135–152). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0314-6_7

Coetzee, V., Greeff, J. M., Stephen, I. D., & Perrett, D. I. (2014). Cross-cultural agreement in facial attractiveness preferences: The role of ethnicity and gender. PLOS ONE, 9(7), e99629. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099629

Cunningham, M. R., Roberts, A. R., Wu, C. H., Barbee, A. P., & Druen, P. B. (1995). “Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours”: Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(2), 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.261

Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. Murray.

Etcoff, N. (1999). Survival of the prettiest: The science of beauty. Anchor Books.

Font, E., & Carazo, P. (2021). False dichotomies and human sexual size dimorphism: A comment of Dunsworth (2020). Evolution and Human Behavior, 42(2), 176–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.08.003

Grammer, K., Fink, B., Møller, A. P., & Thornhill, R. (2003). Darwinian aesthetics: Sexual selection and the biology of beauty. Biological Reviews, 78(3), 385–407. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1464793102006085

Kenrick, D. T., Keefe, R. C., Bryan, A., Barr, A., & Brown, S. (1995). Age preferences and mate choice among homosexuals and heterosexuals: A case for modular psychological mechanisms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(6), 1166–1172. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1166

Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(3), 390–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390

Langlois, J. H., Ritter, J. M., Roggman, L. A., & Vaughn, L. S. (1991). Facial diversity and infant preferences for attractive faces. Developmental Psychology, 27(1), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.27.1.79

Miller, G. F. (2000). The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. Vintage.

Muller, M. N., Thompson, M. E., & Wrangham, R. W. (2006). Male chimpanzees prefer mating with old females. Current Biology, 16(22), 2234–2238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.09.042

Singh D., Dixson B. J., Jessop T. S., Morgan B., & Dixson A. F. (2010). Cross-cultural consensus for waist–hip ratio and women’s attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(3), 176–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.09.001

Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 293–307. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.65.2.293

Singh, D., & Singh, D. (2011). Shape and significance of feminine beauty: An evolutionary perspective. Sex Roles, 64, 723–731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9938-z

Singh, D., Renn, P., & Singh, A. (2007). Did the perils of abdominal obesity affect the depiction of female beauty in the sixteeth to eighteenth century British literature? Exploring the health and beauty link. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 274(1611), 891–894. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.0239

Stewart-Williams, S., & Thomas, A. G. (2013). The ape that thought it was a peacock: Does evolutionary psychology exaggerate human sex differences? Psychological Inquiry, 24(3), 137–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2013.804899

Symons, D. (1995). Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder: The evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. In P. R. Abramson & S. D. Pinkerton (Eds.), Sexual nature, sexual culture (pp. 80–119). The University of Chicago Press.

Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871-1971 (pp. 139–179). Aldine Publishing Company.

Downloads

Published

2023-02-23

How to Cite

Font, E., & Font‐Ferrer, E. V. (2023). Beauty and mate choice: What evolutionary biology can teach us. Metode Science Studies Journal, (13), 153–159. https://doi.org/10.7203/metode.13.24205
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    1653
  • PDF
    660

Issue

Science. The genesis of ideas (vol. 13, 2023)

Section

Beauty and nature

License

All the documents in the OJS platform are open access and property of their respective authors.

Authors publishing in the journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors keep the rights and guarantee Metode Science Studies Journal the right to be the first publication of the document, licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of authorship and publication in the journal.
  2. Authors are allowed and encouraged to spread their work through electronic means using personal or institutional websites (institutional open archives, personal websites or professional and academic networks profiles) once the text has been published.

Metrics

Similar Articles

> >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.