Assessment of Student and Teacher’s Reaction in a Blended Learning Model for Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.13.1.4214Keywords:
Blended learning, online learning, quality, quality assess-ment, key success factors, higher education, distance edu-cation, Moodle, learning object, instructional design, organizational barriers, standards
Abstract
Although previous experience shows that probably the most important key success factor for traditional education in classroom is the teacher’s performance, it is easy to see that things must be different in online education, because the teacher –instructor, tutor, guide, etc.- has a different role in this new kind of education. This work aims to show the analysis of a blended learning experience in higher education in order to identify key success factors for quality and organizational barriers.
References
Adobe. (2006). Adobe Breeze Solutions: Adobe. Fecha de consulta: 20/07/06 http://www.adobe.com/products/breeze/solutions/rapid_training/.
Akeroyd, J. (2005). Information management and e-learning - Some perspectives. Aslib Proceedings, 57(2), 157-167.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00012530510589128
Allen, M. (2003). Michael Allen’s Guide to e-Learning. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Alonso, F., Lopez, G., Manrique, D., & Vi-nes, J. M. (2005). An instructional model for web-based e-learning education with a blended learning process approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 217-235.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00454.x
AMIPCI. (2005). Hábitos de los Usuarios de Internet en México 2005. Fecha de consulta: 20/05/2006, en http://www.amipci.org.mx/estudios.php.
Anderson, T., & Elloumi, F. (2004). Theory and Practice of Online Learning. Athabas-ca: Athabasca University.
Anido, L., & Llamas, M. (2001). A contribu-tion to the e-learning standardization. Paper presented at the Standardization and Inno-vation in Information Technology, 2001 2nd IEEE Conference.
Ball, R. (2003). Libraries and distance edu-cation - a German view. Libri, 53(2), 71-81.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/LIBR.2003.71
Bennet, A., & Elman, C. (2006). Qualitative research: Recent Developments in Case Study Methods. Annual Review of Political Science(9), 455-476.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104918
Berggren, A., Burgos, D., Fontana, J. M., Hinkelman, D., & Hung, V. (2005). Practi-cal and pedagogical issues for teacher adoption of IMS learning desing standards in Moodle LMS. Journal of Interactive Me-dia in Education(2), 1-24.
Bermejo, S. (2005). Cooperative electronic learning in virtual laboratories through fo-rums. IEEE Transactions on Education, 48(1), 140-149.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TE.2004.837045
Birnbaum, M. H. (2004). Human research and data collection via the internet. Annual Review of Psychology(55), 803-832.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141601
Bork, A., & Ju, G.-F. N. (2005). Elearning versus Alearning. Paper presented at the Advanced Learning Technologies, 2005. ICALT 2005. Fifth IEEE International Con-ference on.
Carman, J. M. (2002). Blended learning de-sign: five key ingredients. KnowledgeNet, 1-11.
Clark, D. (2003). The psychology of learn-ing. EPIC Group.
Coman, P. G. (2002). Critical success fac-tors for eLearning delivery. Paper presented at the Computers in Education, 2002. Pro-ceedings. International Conference on.
Concannon, F., Flynn, A., & Campbell, M. (2005). What campus-based students think about the quality and benefits of e-learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 501-512.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00482.x
Cook, D. A., & Dupras, D. M. (2004). A Practical Guide To Developing Effective Web-based Learning. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 19(6), 698-707.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30029.x
Currier, S., & Campbell, L. M. (2002). Learning technologies critical success fac-tors for eLearning implementation: educa-tional technology interoperability stand-ards. Paper presented at the Computers in Education, 2002. Proceedings. International Conference on.
Davies, A., Ramsay, J., Lindfield, H., & Couperthwaite, J. (2005). A blended ap-proach to learning: added value and les-sons learnt from students' use of computer-based materials for neurological analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(5), 839-849.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00506.x
De Vries, J., & Bersin, J. (2004). Rapid eLearning: What works. Market, tools, techniques and best practices form building e-learning programs in weeks. Fecha de consulta, 20/07/06 en http://www.adobe.com/products/breeze/whitepapers/bersin_elearning_fp.html.
Dougiamas, M. (2006). Moodle (Versión 1.5.3): Moodle Organization. http://www.moodle.org/. Fecha de consulta: 20/07/06
Elissavet, G. & Economides, A. A. (2003). An Evaluation Instrument for Hypermedia Courseware. Journal of Educational Tech-nology and Society, 6(2), 31-44.
Forman, D. (2002). Cultural change for the e-world. Paper presented at the Computers in Education, 2002. Proceedings. Interna-tional Conference on.
Frank, K. A., Zhao, Y., & Borman, K. (2004). Social capital and the diffusion of innovations within organizations: The case of computer technology in schools. Sociolo-gy of Education, 77(2), 148-171.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/003804070407700203
Gagné, R. M. (1997). The Conditions of Learning (3rd ed.). New York: Holt,Rinehart & Winston.
Hall, T. B. (2002). Curriculum development critical success factors for eLearning im-plementation. Paper presented at the Com-puters in Education, 2002. Proceedings. In-ternational Conference on.
Henry. (2001). E-learning technology, con-tent and services. Education + Training, 3(4), 249±255.
Hosie, P., & Schibeci, R. (2005). Checklist and context-bound evaluations of online learning in higher education. British Jour-nal of Educational Technology, 36(5), 881-895.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00513.x
INEGI. (2005). Usuarios de Internet por lugares de acceso, 2001 a 2005. Fecha de consulta: 20/07/06, en http://www.inegi.gob.mx/est/contenidos/espanol/rutinas/ept.asp?t=tinf212&c=5569.
ITC. (1998). ITC's Definition of Distance Education. Fecha de consulta: 01/04/06, en http://www.itcnetwork.org/definition.htm.
Krosnick, J. A. (1999). Survey Research. Annual Review of Psychology(50), 537-567.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.537
KTU. Moodle Teacher's Manual 1.5.3. Fe-cha de consulta: 22/07/06, en http://moodle.tokem.fi/mod/book/view.php?id=5116.
Latchem, C. (2005). Failure—the key to un-derstanding success. British Journal of Ed-ucational Technology, 36(4), 665–667.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00543.x
Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking University Teaching: A framework for the effective use of learning technologies (2nd ed.). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203304846
Liu, C., & Lee, J. (2005). Prompting concep-tual understanding with computer-mediated peer discourse and knowledge acquisition techniques. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(5), 821-837.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00505.x
Luan, W. S., Fung, N. S., Nawawi, M., & Hong, T. S. (2005). Experienced and inex-perienced Internet users among pre-service teachers: Their use and attitudes toward the Internet. Educational Technology & Socie-ty, 8(1), 90-103.
McPherson, M. (2002). Organisational criti-cal success factors for managing eLearning implementation. Paper presented at the Computers in Education, 2002. Proceed-ings. International Conference on.
McPherson, M. (2005). Developing innova-tion in e-learning: lessons to be learned. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2005(36), 585 -586.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00548.x
McVay, J. G., Snyder, K. D., & Graetz, K. A. (2005). Evolution of a laptop university: a case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 513-524.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00487.x
Millwood, R., & Terrell, I. (2005). Over-view: New technology, learning and as-sessment in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42(3), 195-204.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587910500167860
Miniwatts International, L. (2005, Noviembre 9 2005). INTERNET USAGE STATISTICS - The Big Picture World Inter-net Users and Population Stats. Fecha de consulta: 18/11/06 2005, en http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm.
O'Hara, K., & Sellen, A. (1997). A Compari-son of Reading Paper and On-Line Docu-ments. Fecha de consulta: 15/07/07, en http://www.acm.org/sigchi/chi97/proceedings/paper/koh.htm.
Questionnaire Module. (2006). Fecha de consulta: 20/07/06, en http://docs.moodle.org/en/Questionnaire_module
Questionnaire. Cuestionario phpESP. (2006). Fecha de consulta: 20/07/06, en http://docs.moodle.org/es/Questionnaire
Reforma. (2005, 29 de julio 2005). Reprueba México en e-aprendizaje. Reforma, p. 1.
Schillit, B. N., Golovchinsky, G., & Price, M. N. (1998). Beyond Paper: Supporting Active Reading with Free Form Digital Ink Annotations. Proceedings CHI 98, April, 249-256.
SGC. (1999). Statgraphics Plus for Windows (Versión 4.0): Statistical Graphics Corp.
Tourangeau, R. (2004). SURVEY RE-SEARCH AND SOCIETAL CHANGE. An-nual Review of Psychology(55), 775-801.
Wang, M. Y., & Hwang, M. J. (2004). The e-learning library: only a warehouse of learn-ing resources? Electronic Library, 22(5), 408-415.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02640470410561929
Wautier, J. L., Vileyn, F., & Lefrere, J. J. (2005). Electronic learning: interactive learning in medicine. Transfusion Clinique Et Biologique, 12(2), 150-152.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tracli.2005.04.015
Wiley, D. A.Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. Fecha de con-sulta: 20 oct 05 2005, en http://www.elearning-reviews.org/topics/technology/learning-objects/2001-wiley-learning-objects-instructional-design-theory/
Williams, P., Nicholas, D., & Gunter, B. (2005). E-learning: what the literature tells us about distance education - An overview. Aslib Proceedings, 57(2), 109-122.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00012530510589083
Wopereis, I. G. J. H., Kirschner, P. A., Paas, A., Stoyanov, S., & Hendriks, M. (2005). Failure and success factors of educational ICT projects: a group concept mapping ap-proach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 681–684.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00546.x
Zenger, J. T., & Walker, T. J. (2000). Impact of the internet on entomology teaching and research. Annual Review of Entomology (45), 747-767
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
The authors grant non-exclusive rights of exploitation of works published to RELIEVE and consent to be distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial Use 4.0 International License (CC-BY-NC 4.0), which allows third parties to use the published material whenever the authorship of the work and the source of publication is mentioned, and it is used for non-commercial purposes.
The authors can reach other additional and independent contractual agreements, for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (for example, by including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), as long as it is clearly stated that the Original source of publication is this magazine.
Authors are encouraged to disseminate their work after it has been published, through the internet (for example, in institutional archives online or on its website) which can generate interesting exchanges and increase work appointments.
The fact of sending your paper to RELIEVE implies that you accept these conditions.
Language
Information