Equipercentile equating of the Basic Ability and Knowledge Test (EXHCOBA)

Authors

  • Luz Elena Antillón Universidad Autónoma de Baja California
  • Norma Larrazolo Responsable del Examen de Habilidades y Conocimientos Básicos (EXHCOBA)
  • Eduardo Backhoff Director de Pruebas y Medición del Instituto Nacional para la Evaluación de la Educación (INEE)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.12.2.4227

Keywords:

Test equating, equipercentil equating method, Basic Abili-ties and Knowledge Test.

Abstract

Equipercentile equating method is a statistical procedure where student raw scores of two different versions of the same test are considered equated if they correspond to the same percentile range. A graphic curve is presented to describe the difficult differences from version to version of a test. This work was aimed to estimate the equipercentil equating values, by academic content area, of the Basic Ability and Knowledge Test (EXHCOBA, by its Spanish acronym) that is used by the University of Baja California (UABC) as a selection student test. This norm-referenced test has excellent quality standards, a high technological development, several reliability and validity support studies, and others good psychometric parameters. Estimation of equating parameters was done applying the analytic method described by Kolen and Brennan (1995), with the random group procedure utilized by UABC to collect data. Results shows that equating was effective to adjust four statistical moments (mean, standard deviation, bias, and kurtosis) of the frequency distributions of EXHCOBA´s version 3 and 4 compared with version 2, by content area, producing equal score distributions. Nevertheless, irregularities appeared at the ends of the curves that suggests the need of a smoothing procedure.

References

AERA, APA, NCME (1999). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association (APA).

Arce-Ferrer, A. & Backhoff, E. (2002). Efecto del método de igualación en la equiva-lencia de los exámenes nacionales. Revista Mexicana de Psicología 19(2), 101-114.

Backhoff, E. (2001). Desarrollo, validación e implementación de un sistema para la selección de estudiantes a la Universidad Autónoma de Baja California. Aguascalientes: Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes.

Backhoff, E., Ibarra, M. & Rosas, M. (1995). Sistema Computarizado de Exámenes (SI-CODEX). Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 10(1), 55-62.

Backhoff, E. y Tirado, F. (1993). Habilidades y Conocimientos Básicos del Estudiante Universitario: hacia los estándares nacionales. Revista de la Educación Superior, 88, 45-65.

Backhoff, E. & Tirado, F. (1992). Desarrollo del Examen de Habilidades y Conocimientos Básicos (EXHCOBA). Revista de la Educación Superior, 83, 23-44.

Glowacki, M. (1991). An Analysis of Test Equating Models for the Alabama High School Graduation Examination. Design. 27p. Lexington, KY: Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 340 720).

Hanson, B. (1991). A comparison of bivariate smoothing methods in common-item equipercentile equating. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 391-408.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014662169101500410

Holland, P. & Rubin, D. (1982). Test equating. Nueva York: Academic Press.

Kolen, M. (1984). Effectiveness of analytic smoothing in equipercentile equating. Journal of Educational Statistics, 9, 25-44.

http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1164830

Kolen, M. (1991). Smoothing methods for estimating test score distributions. Journal of Educational Measurement, 28, 257-282.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1991.tb00358.x

Kolen, M. & Brennan, R. (1995). Test equating. Nueva York: Springer-Verlag.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2412-7

Linn, R. L. (1993). Educational measurement. (3rd. ed.). Nueva York: American Council on Education. Series on Higher Ed-ucation. Oryx Press.

Martínez, F. Backhoff, E., Casta-eda, S., Del la Orden, A., Schmelkes, S., Solano-Flores, G., Tristán, A. y Vidal, R. (2000). Estándares de calidad para instrumentos de evaluación educativa. México: CENEVAL.

Petersen, N., Kolen, M. & Hoover, H. (1989). Scaling, norming, and equating. En R. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement. New York, NY: Macmillan.

Tristan, A. (1996). Igualación o equivalencia de calificaciones utilizando la computadora. 2do. Memorias del Foro Nacional de Evaluación Educativa. México: CENEVAL.

Walberg, H. & Haertel, G. (1992). The international encyclopedia of educational evalu-ation. New York: Pergamon Press.

Issue

Section

Research Articles