Diseño de programaciones cortas para futuros profesores de Inglés en España

Autores/as

  • Gloria Luque Agulló University of Jaén

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7203/attic.20.9592

Palabras clave:

era post-método, diseño curricular, programación didáctica, enseñanza de inglés, España

Resumen

En este artículo se describe el proceso para que los futuros profesores de lenguas extranjeras (inglés) de Educación Secundaria aprendan a diseñar programaciones didácticas adaptadas al contexto español, según la ley educativa más reciente (LOMCE). Considerando la multitud de propuestas de métodos de enseñanza desde principios del siglo XX, y las continuas reformas educativas en España, los futuros profesionales de la enseñanza deben adquirir las competencias y habilidades necesarias para el desarrollo de programaciones que se adapten a las diferentes leyes, al mismo tiempo que se incrementa su autoestima y maestría en el aula.

Biografía del autor/a

Gloria Luque Agulló, University of Jaén

Profesora titular de Filología Inglesa desde enero de 2004. Especialista en Lingüística Aplicada.

Citas

Ahmadian, M., and Rad, S.E. (2014). Postmethod era and glocalized language curriculum development: A fresh burden on language teachers. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(3),  592-598. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.5.3.592-598

Bachman, L. F. (1990) Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bolívar, A., and Domingo, J. (2006). The professional identity of secondary school teachers in Spain crisis and reconstruction. Theory and Research in Education, 4(3), 339-355. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878506069105

Brumfit, C. J. (1984). Function and structure of a state school syllabus for learners of second or foreign language with heterogeneous needs. In C.J. Brumfit (ed.). General English syllabus design. Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 75-82.

Can, N. (2012). Post-method pedagogy: Teacher growth behind walls. Proceedings of the 10th METU ELT Convention. Available at: http://dbe.metu.edu.tr/convention/proceedingsweb/Pedagogy.pdf (Accessed: 8/10/2014)

Canale, M. (1983). From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy’. Language and Communication, 1, 1-47.

Chomsky, N. (1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. Special technical report. Research laboratory of electronics. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology (11).

Council of Europe (2001) Common European framework of reference for language learning, teaching and assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cummins, J. (1979). Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children. Review of Educational Research, 49(2), 222-251. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543049002222

Ehrman, M. E., Leaver, B.L. and Oxford, R. (2003). A brief overview of individual differences in second language learning. System, 31(3), 313-330. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00045-9

Farrell, C. (2002). Lesson planning. In J.C. Richards and W.A. Renandya (eds.) Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 30-39. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667190

Fullan, M. (2007) The new meaning of educational change. New York: Routledge.

Graves, K. (2016). Language curriculum design: possibilities and realities. In G. Hall (Ed.). The Routledge handbook of English language teaching. London & New York: Routledge, pp 79-94.

Hadley, G. (1998) Examining the underlying principles of EFL syllabus design. 敬和学園大学研究紀要, 7, 211-228.

Hall, G. (2016). Method, methods and methodology: historical trends and current debates. In G. Hall (ed.). The Routledge handbook of English language teaching. London & New York: Routledge, pp. 209-223.

Hashemi, S. M. R. (2011). (Post)-Methodism: Possibility of the Impossible?’. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 2(1), 137-145. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.1.137-145

Hymes, D. (1967). Models of the interaction of language and social setting. Journal of Social Issues, 23(2), 8-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1967.tb00572.x

Kearsley, G. and Lynch, W. (1996). Structural issues in distance education. Journal of Education for Business, 71(4), 191-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.1996.10116783

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2001). Toward a postmethod pedagogy. TESOL quarterly, 35(4), 537-560. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588427

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2002). Beyond Methods: Macrostrategies for language teaching. Yale: Yale University Press.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). TESOL methods: Changing tracks, challenging trends. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 59-81. https://doi.org/10.2307/40264511

Luque, G. (2017). Syllabus design for pre-service English language teachers in the shifting arena of the continuous Spanish educational reforms. XXXV AESLA Conference. Languages at the crossroads: training, accreditation and context of use. Jaén, May, 4-6.

Nation, P. and Macallister, J. (2009). Language curriculum design. New York: Routledge.

Nunan, D. (1988). Syllabus design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ramos, M.M. and Luque, G. (2010). A competence-based constructivist tool for evaluation. Cultura y Educación, 22(3), 329-344. https://doi.org/10.1174/113564010804932148

Richards, J.C. (2013). Curriculum approaches in language teaching: Forward, central and backward design. RELC Journal, 44(1), 5-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688212473293

Richards, J.C., and Rodgers, T.S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667305

Skehan, P. (1996). Second language acquisition research and task-based instruction. In J. Willis and D. Willis (eds.) Challenge and change in language teaching. Oxford: Heinemann, pp. 17-30.

Smriti, K. and Jha, S.K. (2015). An overview of ELT syllabi. International Journal of Innovations in TESOL and Applied Linguistics, 1, 1-6.

Tejada, G., Perez, M.L. and Luque, G. (2006). Current approaches and teaching methods. In N. McLaren and D. Madrid (eds.). TEFL in secondary education. Granada: Servicio de publicaciones, pp. 155-209.

Tiana, A., Moya, J. and Luengo, F. (2011). Implementing key competences in basic education: reflections on curriculum design and development in Spain. European Journal of Education, 46(3), 307-322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2011.01482.x

Wang, V. and Stelson, U. (2017). Fundamentals in program development.  In V. Wang (ed.) Handbook of Research on Program Development and Assessment Methodologies in K-20 Education. Hershey: IGI Global, pp. 24-48.

White, R. (1988) The ELT curriculum: Design, innovation and management. Oxford: Blackwell.

Widdowson, H.G. (1990) Aspects of language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Willis, D., and Willis, J. (2008) Doing task-based teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Winke, P. M. (2007). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29(1), 143-144.

Yalden, J. (1983) The communicative syllabus: Evolution, design and implementation. Oxford: Pergamon.

Archivos adicionales

Publicado

2018-06-21