Constance and the Machine: Conflicts of Modernity and Gender in D.H. Lawrence’s “Cocksure Women and Hensure Men” and Lady Chatterley’s Lover

Authors

  • Anneloes Jager University of Groningen, The Netherlands

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7203/eutopias.0.18580

Keywords:

D.H. Lawrence, gender, masculinity

Abstract

Lawrence’s “Cocksure Women and Hensure Men” and Lady Chatterley’s Lover both base their argument around gender essentialism. Lady Chatterley’s Lover and the debate surrounding the trial that led to its uncensored publication are rooted in a combination of sexual, gender, and class politics. Moreover, while Lady Chatterley’s Lover may look like a critique of individuality and industrialization, it is actually a critique of a hegemonic masculinity based on rationality. This paper will argue that one of the central conflicts of the novel is that surrounding early-twentieth-century hegemonic masculinity, by means of R.W. Connell’s theory. Through unravelling the complex gender politics in Lawrence’s work and placing them in their historical context, this paper argues that his work is more reactionary than subversive.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bedient, Calvin (1966), “The Radicalism of ‘Lady Chatterley’s Lover’”, The Hudson Review, 19, 3, pp. 407-16.

Black, Michael H. (2017), “D.H. Lawrence”, Encyclopedia Britannica, Britannica.com.

Connell, R. W. (2005), Masculinities, Berkeley: University of California Press.

Connell, R. W. (1987), Gender and Power, Cambridge: Polity Press.

Francis, Martin (2002), “The Domestication of the Male? Recent Research on Nineteenth-and Twentieth- Century British Masculinity”, The Historical Journal, 45, 3, pp. 637-652.

Gubar, Susan, and Sandra Gilbert (1979), The Madwoman in the Attic, New Haven: Yale UP.

Kimmel, Michael S. & Aronson, Amy (2003), Men and Masculinities: A Social, Cultural, and Historical Encyclopedia, Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.

Lawrence, D. H. (1954), Selected Essays, London: Penguin.

Lawrence, D. H. (1961), Lady Chatterley’s Lover, London: Penguin.

Lusty, Natalya, & Murphet, Julian (ed.) (2014), Modernism and Masculinity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Marinetti, Filippo, (2017) [1909], “The Futurist Manifesto”, BBC news, bbcnews.com.

Millett, Kate (1970), Sexual Politics, London: Virago.

Raub, Patricia (1994), “A New Woman or an Old-Fashioned Girl? The Portrayal of the Heroine in Popular Women’s Novels of the Twenties”, American Studies, 35, 1, pp. 109-130.

Rolph, C.H. (ed.) (1961), The Trial of Lady Chatterley, London: Penguin.

Simmel, Georg & Wolff, Kurt (1950), The Sociology of Georg Simmel, Glenco: Free Press.

“smart, adj.” (2017), OED Online, Oxford University Press.

Worthen, John (2005), DH Lawrence: The Life of an Outsider, Counterpoint Press.

Downloads

Published

2018-07-02

How to Cite

Jager, A. (2018). Constance and the Machine: Conflicts of Modernity and Gender in D.H. Lawrence’s “Cocksure Women and Hensure Men” and Lady Chatterley’s Lover. EU-topías. A Journal on Interculturality, Communication, and European Studies, 15, 131–141. https://doi.org/10.7203/eutopias.0.18580
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    177
  • PDF
    64

Issue

Section

DOSSIER

Metrics