The informational-interpretative aspects of large-scale and global crises

Authors

  • Gustavo Rick Amaral School of Exact Sciences and Technology Postgraduate Program in Technologies of Intelligence and Digital Design (TIDD) Pontifical Catholic University - São Paulo, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0063-6119

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7203/eutopias.24.25271

Keywords:

Communication, cultural adaptation, cognitive bias, misinformation, Anthropocene

Abstract

This paper discusses informational and interpretative aspects of large-scale crises like the COVID-19 pandemic and Climate Change. Laypeople might have difficulties interpreting information about «how a vaccine or the climate works» or «why a specific medication is safe and some particular research results are reliable» once this type of information requires some basic cognitive tools like statistical reasoning. This paper introduces the concept of adaptational lag to explain the general interpretative difficulties involved in abstract and scientific topics, which are basic in the modern complex world, particularly in large-scale crises. Statistics is a recent cultural cognitive development whose learning process in the individual mind is costly and, in many aspects, problematic due to cognitive bias and the automatic and intuitive mode of thinking. In comparative terms, the human mind is prewired to language. Humans are adapted on a genetic level to acquire language. From an adaptational perspective, statistical reasoning is a very different type of cognitive acquisition. In order to establish the concept of adaptational lag on some important contemporary scientific frameworks about the human mind, this article presents a brief comparative study of three cognitive acquisitions: (a) language, (b) written systems, (c) statistics and statistical reasoning. In the case of the human language faculty, the analysis is based on the theoretical framework developed by psychologist Michael Tomasello. In the case of the human capacity to write and read symbols, the analysis is based on the empirical and experimental work developed by neuroscientist Stanislas Dehaene. Finally, the analysis of the difficulties faced by the human mind in dealing with statistical reasoning is based on the «dual process theory» proposed by psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky. The present article argues that the major crises in the Anthropocene – the COVID-19 pandemic and the Climate Change are only two of them – will demand considerable reformation in the modern world epistemic institutions (universities, schools, and press media) to overcome the adaptational lag.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Gustavo Rick Amaral, School of Exact Sciences and Technology Postgraduate Program in Technologies of Intelligence and Digital Design (TIDD) Pontifical Catholic University - São Paulo, Brazil

Gustavo Rick is PhD in Intelligence Technologies and Digital Design at the Catholic Pontifical University of São Paulo (PUC-SP) and holds a master’s degree in Communication and Semiotics (PUC-SP). His research areas are theoretical semiotics, philosophy of science and epistemology, communication and science divulgation, application of Data Science and A. I.-assisted methodologies in semiotic research, application of cognitive models in the study of general signification process and various disinformation phenomena. He is co-author of the book Os avanços da ciência podem acabar com a filosofia? ( Will the advances of science put an end to philosophy? ), a researcher at the International Center for Peirce Studies at the Catholic Pontificial University of São Paulo (CIEP-PUC-SP) and a member of the Transobjeto research group (dedicated to the study of the implications of emergent techno-sciences in epistemology, ethics and politics), also at PUC-SP. At present he is professor of Communication at Anhembi-Morumbi University.

References

Dehaene, Stanislas. Reading in the Brain: the new science of how we read. USA: Penguin group, 2010.

 

Greene, Joshua. Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap between Us and Them. New York: The Penguin Press, 2013.

 

Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking fast and slow. London: Penguin Books, 2011.

 

Kahneman, Daniel & Amos Tversky. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291, 1979.

 

Laland, Kevin & Gillian Brown. Niche Construction, Human Behavior, and the Adaptive-Lag Hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology - EVOL ANTHROPOL. 15. 95-104, 2006.

 

Naiman, R. J., C. A. Johnston & J. C. Kelley. Alteration of North American Streams by Beaver. BioScience, 38(11), 753–762, 1988.

 

Odling-Smee, F. J. .«Niche constructing phenotypes». In Plotkin, H. C. (ed.). The Role of Behavior in Evolution. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press. pp. 73–132, 1988.

 

Pinker, Steven. The cognitive niche: coevolution of intelligence, sociality and language. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 8993–8999, 2010.

 

Pinker, Steven. Rationality: What Is It, Why It Seems Scarce, Why It Matters. New York: Viking Press, 2021.

 

Tomasello, Michael. Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2003.

 

Tomasello, Michael. Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2008.

 

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Global education monitoring report 2019: Migration, displacement and education: Building bridges, not walls, 2018.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-30

How to Cite

Amaral, G. R. (2022). The informational-interpretative aspects of large-scale and global crises. EU-topías. A Journal on Interculturality, Communication, and European Studies, 24, 87–98. https://doi.org/10.7203/eutopias.24.25271
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    243
  • PDF
    88

Issue

Section

DOSSIER

Metrics

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.