REQUESTS AND MITIGATION: A COMPARISON BETWEEN ITALIAN AND BRAZILIAN PORTUGUESE

Authors

  • Elisabetta Santoro Universidade de São Paulo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7203/Normas.v7i2.11173

Keywords:

Requests, Mitigation, Cross-Cultural Pragmatics, Italian, Brazilian Portuguese

Abstract

In the perspective of Cross-Cultural Pragmatics, the study focuses on the speech act of the request and is based on data collected through a written DCT (Discourse Completion Test), sent electronically to native speakers of Italian and Brazilian Portuguese in their respective mother tongue. Informants were asked to write what they would have said in the described situations. The main variables were rank of imposition and social distance between the interlocutors. The aim of the research, which thanks to the instrument used allows to collect a large number of data and is expandable and replicable, is to analyze contrastively the data collected in the two languages, identifying the presence of modifiers in the request and the effect of the chosen variables, in order to observe similarities and differences, and above all, occurrences that may represent also a reference point for future research. This paper will present the first results based on a sample of 30 native speakers of Italian and 30 of Brazilian Portuguese.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-20

How to Cite

Santoro, E. (2017). REQUESTS AND MITIGATION: A COMPARISON BETWEEN ITALIAN AND BRAZILIAN PORTUGUESE. Normas, 7(2), 179–204. https://doi.org/10.7203/Normas.v7i2.11173
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    1007
  • PDF (Español)
    770

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 2 (2017): Lenguaje vago y atenuación II

Section

Special topic section

License

Creative Commons License 
This article is under this license: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 .

Authors agree with the following statements:

  • The authors retain the copyright and guarantee the journal the right to be the first publication of the work as well as a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the authorship of the work and the initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors may separately establish additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (for example, place it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (for example, in institutional repositories or on their own website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive scientific exchanges.

Metrics