COMMON KNOWLEDGE AND FOLKLORE EVIDENTIALITY: SOCIOPRAGMATIC PATTENS OF SPEECH IN MADRID
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7203/Normas.v11i1.20266Keywords:
evidentiality, folklore, common knowledge, sociopragmatics, PRESEEAAbstract
This paper sets out the results of sociopragmatic research into common knowledge or folklore evidentiality in the speech of Madrid, Spain's norm-radiating capital. Its working assumptions are that the expression of evidentiality in Spanish is strategic and constitutes, above all, a resource for mitigating; and that, as with other pragmatic phenomena, the use and functioning of the popular knowledge evidentiality varies sociolinguistically and geolectally. In order to ascertain the functional performance of this type of evidence and patterns of sociolectal and geolectal variation, its occurrence has been studied in a corpus of semi-directed oral interviews with Madrilenians, the PRESEEA-Madrid corpus. A common methodology, as established by Cestero and Kotwica (en prensaa, en prensab), was employed, which aims at systematic and homogeneous qualitative and quantitative analyses. The preliminary findings confirm that it is a strategic sociopragmatic resource seldom used in Madrid. When it is used, it is mostly to mitigate and to distance oneself from what has been said. Men use it more than women, adults more than young and old people, and subjects with mid-level education more than those with higher or basic education. However, higher rates are found among specific sociolects, which enables their future to be predicted.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
-
Abstract490
-
PDF (Español)236
Issue
Section
License
This article is under this license: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 .
Authors agree with the following statements:
- The authors retain the copyright and guarantee the journal the right to be the first publication of the work as well as a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the authorship of the work and the initial publication in this journal.
- Authors may separately establish additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (for example, place it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (for example, in institutional repositories or on their own website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive scientific exchanges.