The Egalitarian Quality of Lottocracy

Authors

  • Julia Jakobi University of Hamburg

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7203/qfia.6.2.16054

Abstract

Abstract. Recently, political models which employ lottery-selection instead of ballot voting have been proposed. Proponents argue that such lottocraticmodels can improve the representation of the population and reduce undemocratic influences. In this paper, I argue that these proposals also satisfy the egalitarian requirement of democracy. I claim that having an equal chance to be selected by lot is equally egalitarian as having an equally weighed vote for two reasons: first, having a chance to be selected by lot satisfies the requirement for political justicebetter than electoral democracy and second, it provides citizens with equal political influence and not merely equal impact.

Keywords: Lottocracy, Procedural Democracy, Political Equality, Political Fairness, Egalitarian Democracy

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2019-11-26

How to Cite

Jakobi, J. (2019). The Egalitarian Quality of Lottocracy. Quaderns De Filosofia, 6(2), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.7203/qfia.6.2.16054
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    807
  • PDF
    1369

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 2 (2019)

Section

Research Papers

License

Works published in QUADERNS DE FILOSOFIA are under the licence Creative Commons Attribution-NonComercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

The authors authorize the publisher to archive the article into databases and indexes (such as EBSCO, DOAJ, ProQuest), and permit the publisher to apply DOI to the article.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Metrics