Responsibility for collective performances: a bratmanian proposal

Authors

  • Jose Manuel Fernández Departamento de Derecho Penal, Universidad Alberto Hurtado Investigador Instituto Milenio VIODEMOS (Violence and Democracy Institute) http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7046-3420

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7203/CEFD.47.24580

Abstract

This essay seeks to identify the conditions under which responsibility can be established in cases of collective performances, specifically when these give rise to justified judgments of symmetrical responsibility. Establishing responsibility supposes an answer to the question of what collective performance is. However, as the two cases’ discussion shows, there is no clarity regarding the answer to that question nor the importance of answering it. It is argued that, based on Bratman’s model, collective performances can be understood as shared intentions leading to shared activity. The research concludes by showing that this model can respond precisely to what is a collective performance and how judgments of symmetrical responsibility depend on its satisfaction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Jose Manuel Fernández, Departamento de Derecho Penal, Universidad Alberto Hurtado Investigador Instituto Milenio VIODEMOS (Violence and Democracy Institute)

 Profesor Asociado del Departamento de Derecho Penal 

References

AMBOS, K.; Treatise on International Criminal Law. Volume I: Foundations and General Part, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013.

BRATMAN, M.; Faces of Intention. Selected Essays on Intention and Agency. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999. 

BRATMAN, M., “Modest sociality and the distinctiveness of intention”, Philosophical Studies, Vol. 144, 2010, pp. 149-165.

BRATMAN, M; Shared Agency. A Planning Theory of Act ing Together. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2014.

BRATMAN, M., “Shared Agency: Replies to Ludwig, Pacherie, Petersson, Roth, and Smith”, Journal of Social Ontology, Vol. 1 (1), 2015, pp. 59-76.

GILBERT, M., On Social Facts. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1992.

HEATH, J., “Methodological Individualism”, en E. Zalta, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy [visitado el 25.05.2022].

HELD, V., “Can a random collective of individuals be morally responsible?”, The Journal of Philosophy, Vol 76 (14), 1970, pp. 471-481.

JANKOVIC, M. y LUDWIG, K., (eds.); The Routledge Handbook of Collective Intentionality. Abingdon, Routledge, 2017.

LUDWIG, K., “Shared Agency in Modest Sociality”, Journal of Social Ontology, Vol. 1 (1), 2015, pp. 7-15.

LUDWIG, K., From Individual to Plural Agency. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2017.

MILLER, S., Social Action. A Teleological Account. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2001.

PETTIT P., y SCHWEIKARD D., “Joint Actions and Group Agents”, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Vol. 36 (1), 2006, pp. 18-39.

ROXIN, C.; Derecho Penal Parte General, Tomo II. Madrid, Civitas, 2014.

SCANLON, T.; What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge Mass., Harvard University Press, 1998.

STRAWSON, P., “Freedom and Resentment”, Proceedings of the British Academy, Vol. 48, 1962, pp. 1-25.

TUOMELA, R; The Philosophy of Sociality. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2007.

WALLACE, J.; Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments. Cambridge Mass., Harvard University Press, 1996.

Published

2022-12-15

How to Cite

Fernández, J. M. (2022). Responsibility for collective performances: a bratmanian proposal. Cuadernos Electrónicos De Filosofía Del Derecho, (47), 36–60. https://doi.org/10.7203/CEFD.47.24580
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    515
  • PDF (Español)
    512

Issue

Section

Articles

Metrics