Paradox and argumentation: From rhetoric to the refinement of mathematics

Authors

  • Sebastià Serrano University of Barcelona (Spain).

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7203/metode.6.4553

Keywords:

rhetoric, logic, argumentation, paradox, self-reference

Abstract

Paradoxes –?and the problem they present for logic?– can be traced as a subject for reflection from the Sophists to contemporary language philosophers and mathematicians, visiting Aristotle, Abel and Russell along the way, during which time rhetorical algebra transitioned into syncopated algebra and then to symbolic algebra. The paradox can be seen as an obstacle to aseptic reasoning, but it can also act as a compelling stimulus for imagination and the practice of argumentation or persuasion, a rhetorical tool that has encouraged rigorous thinking throughout history, in an attempt to avoid «concealed» lies in all kinds of discourses. It is, therefore, a challenge that inspires creativity within a culture indebted to the rhetorical tradition.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Sebastià Serrano, University of Barcelona (Spain).

Full Professor Emeritus of Linguistics at the University of Barcelona (Spain). He published several studies on linguistics, semiotics and communication theory. He received the St. George’s Cross Award from the Catalan government in 2003. His first book, Elementos de lingüística matemática (“Elements of mathematical linguistics”, Anagrama, 1975) won the Anagrama Essay Award. Two of his most recent books are La fiesta de los sentidos (“The festival of senses”, Now Books, 2009) and Del amor, la mentira y la persuasión (“Of love, lies and persuasion”, Destino, 2013).

References

Hofstadter, D. R. (1979). Gödel, Escher, Bach: An eternal golden brain. New York: Basic Books.

Nagel, E., & Newman, J. R. (1970). El teorema de Gödel. Madrid: Tecnos.

Serrano, S. (1985). La paradoxa. Barcelona: Planeta. Serrano, S. (1996). Comunicació, llenguatge i societat. Barcelona: Edicions 62.

Vega Reñón, L., & Olmos González, P. (Eds.). (2011). Compendio de lógica, argumentación y retórica. Madrid: Trotta.

Downloads

Published

2016-04-15

How to Cite

Serrano, S. (2016). Paradox and argumentation: From rhetoric to the refinement of mathematics. Metode Science Studies Journal, (6), 99–105. https://doi.org/10.7203/metode.6.4553
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    995
  • PDF
    789

Issue

Science grid: The public understanding of science (2016)

Section

Word of Science. The rhetoric of scientific communication

License

All the documents in the OJS platform are open access and property of their respective authors.

Authors publishing in the journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors keep the rights and guarantee Metode Science Studies Journal the right to be the first publication of the document, licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of authorship and publication in the journal.
  2. Authors are allowed and encouraged to spread their work through electronic means using personal or institutional websites (institutional open archives, personal websites or professional and academic networks profiles) once the text has been published.

Metrics

Similar Articles

> >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.