Is beauty a criterion of truth? Genetic quality or aesthetic criteria, drivers of sexual selection in animals

Authors

  • Juan Ignacio Pérez Donostia International Physics Centre (DIPC) in Spain.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7203/metode.13.24722

Keywords:

sexual selection, beauty, evolutionary biology, evolution

Abstract

Do bees or hummingbirds perceive the beauty of the flowers they approach to take nectar? That is, can non-human animals appreciate beauty? Is there a universal truth regarding beauty? Or is it just a useful attribute, an indicator of a valuable trait? As with so many other natural phenomena, there is no simple answer to these questions. In the following document, we analyse different aspects of sexual selection and its connection (or lack thereof) to aesthetic criteria and the so-called handicap principle.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Juan Ignacio Pérez, Donostia International Physics Centre (DIPC) in Spain.

Full Professor of Physiology, director of the Chair of Scientific Culture at the University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), and associate at the Donostia International Physics Centre (DIPC) in Spain. He is the president of Jakiunde, the Academy of Sciences, Arts and Letters of the Basque Country, and of the Advisory Committee of The Conversation Spain. In addition, he is the author of Animales ejemplares and co-author, with Joaquín Sevilla, of Los males de la ciencia (both published by Next Door Publishers in 2020 and 2021, respectively).

References

Brown, S. (2022). Naturalizing aesthetics. In A. Chatterjee & E. R. Cardillo (2022), Brain, beauty, & art: Essays bringing neuroaesthetics into focus (pp. 18–21). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197513620.003.0004

Buskes, C. (2006). Evolutionair denken: De invloed van Darwin op ons wereldbeeld. Uitgeverij Nieuwezijds.

Chatterjee, A., & Cardillo, E. R. (2022). Prologue: Where have we been, and where are we now? In A. Chatterjee & E. R. Cardillo, Brain, beauty, & art: Essays bringing neuroaesthetics into focus (pp. XI–XII). Oxford University Press.

Darwin, C. (1860, 3 April). Letter to Asa Gray. Darwin Correspondence Project. https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/DCP-LETT-2743.xml

Darwin, C. (1877). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. John Murray.

DeAngelis, R. S., & Hofmann, H. A. (2020). Neural and molecular mechanisms underlying female mate choice decisions in vertebrates. Journal of Experimental Biology, 223(17), jeb207324. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.207324

Deutsch, D. (2011). The beginning of infinity. Explanations that transform the world. Viking.

Hoke, K. L., Burmeister, S. S., Fernald, R. D., Rand, A. S., Ryan, M. J., & Wilczynski, W. (2004). Functional mapping of the auditory midbrain during mate call reception. Journal of Neuroscience, 24(50), 11264–11272. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2079-04.2004

Kandel, E. R. (2016). Reductionism in art and brain science. Bridging the two cultures. Columbia University Press.

Keagy, J., Savard, J.-F., & Borgia, G. (2009). Male satin bowerbird problem-solving ability predicts mating success. Animal Behaviour, 78(4), 809–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.07.011

Keagy, J., Savard, J.-F., & Borgia, G. (2011). Complex relationship between multiple measures of cognitive ability and male mating success in satin bowerbirds, Ptilonorhynchus violaceus. Animal Behaviour, 81, 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.02.018

Li, Q., Gao, K.-Q., Vinther, J., Shawkey, M. D., Clarke, J. A., D’Alba, L., Meng, Q., Briggs, D. E., & Prum, R. O. (2010). Plumage color patterns of an extinct dinosaur. Science, 327(5971), 1369–1372. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1186290

Moreno, J. (2013). Evolución por selección sexual según Darwin. La vigencia de una idea. Síntesis.

Nadal, M., & Cela-Conde, C. J. (2022). Bringing it all together. Neurological and neuroimaging evidence of the neural underpinnings of visual aesthetics. In A. Chatterjee & E. R. Cardillo, Brain, beauty, & art: Essays bringing neuroaesthetics into focus (pp. 8–11). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197513620.003.0002

Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? The Philosophical Review, 83(4), 435–450. https://doi.org/10.2307/2183914

Osuna, A. J. (2017, 17 September). Antropomorfismo [conference session]. Naukas, Bilbao. https://www.eitb.eus/es/divulgacion/naukas-bilbao/videos/detalle/5082718/video-naukas-bilbao-2017-antonio-j-osuna-biotay-antropomorfismo/

Prokop, Z. M., Michalczyk, L., Drobniak, S. M., Herdegen, M., & Radwan, J. (2012). Meta-analysis suggests choosy females get sexy sons more than «good genes». Evolution, 66(9), 2665–2673. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01654.x

Prum, R. O. (2012). Aesthetic evolution by mate choice: Darwin’s really dangerous idea. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 367(1600), 2253–2265. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0285

Prum, R. O. (2017). The evolution of beauty: How Darwin’s forgotten theory of mate choice shapes the animal world – and us. Anchor.

Rosenthal, G. G., & Ryan, M. J. (2022). Sexual selection and the ascent of women: Mate choice research since Darwin. Science, 375(6578), eabi6308. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abi6308

Ryan, M. J. (2018). A taste for the beautiful. Princeton University Press.

Sainani, K. (2015). Q&A: David Deutsch. Nature, 526, S16. https://doi.org/10.1038/526S16a

Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection – a selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 53, 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3

Downloads

Published

2023-02-23

How to Cite

Pérez, J. I. (2023). Is beauty a criterion of truth? Genetic quality or aesthetic criteria, drivers of sexual selection in animals. Metode Science Studies Journal, (13), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.7203/metode.13.24722
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    1010
  • PDF
    756

Issue

Science. The genesis of ideas (vol. 13, 2023)

Section

Beauty and nature

License

All the documents in the OJS platform are open access and property of their respective authors.

Authors publishing in the journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors keep the rights and guarantee Metode Science Studies Journal the right to be the first publication of the document, licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of authorship and publication in the journal.
  2. Authors are allowed and encouraged to spread their work through electronic means using personal or institutional websites (institutional open archives, personal websites or professional and academic networks profiles) once the text has been published.

Metrics

Similar Articles

<< < > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.